1996 Holden XU 6 vs. 2006 Volvo XC70
To start off, 2006 Volvo XC70 is newer by 10 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1996 Holden XU 6. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1996 Holden XU 6 would be higher.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2006 Volvo XC70 (541 Nm) has 26 more torque (in Nm) than 1996 Holden XU 6. (515 Nm). This means 2006 Volvo XC70 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1996 Holden XU 6.
Compare all specifications:
1996 Holden XU 6 | 2006 Volvo XC70 | |
Make | Holden | Volvo |
Model | XU 6 | XC70 |
Year Released | 1996 | 2006 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 5 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 408 HP |
Torque | 515 Nm | 541 Nm |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |