1996 Holden XU 6 vs. 2007 Jaguar XJR
To start off, 2007 Jaguar XJR is newer by 11 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1996 Holden XU 6. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1996 Holden XU 6 would be higher.
Because 2007 Jaguar XJR is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2007 Jaguar XJR. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1996 Holden XU 6, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2007 Jaguar XJR (554 Nm) has 39 more torque (in Nm) than 1996 Holden XU 6. (515 Nm). This means 2007 Jaguar XJR will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1996 Holden XU 6.
Compare all specifications:
| 1996 Holden XU 6 | 2007 Jaguar XJR | |
| Make | Holden | Jaguar |
| Model | XU 6 | XJR |
| Year Released | 1996 | 2007 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | V |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 400 HP |
| Torque | 515 Nm | 554 Nm |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
