1996 Holden XU 6 vs. 2008 Nissan Qashqai
To start off, 2008 Nissan Qashqai is newer by 12 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1996 Holden XU 6. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1996 Holden XU 6 would be higher.
Because 2008 Nissan Qashqai is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1996 Holden XU 6. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2008 Nissan Qashqai will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1996 Holden XU 6 (515 Nm) has 319 more torque (in Nm) than 2008 Nissan Qashqai. (196 Nm). This means 1996 Holden XU 6 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2008 Nissan Qashqai.
Compare all specifications:
1996 Holden XU 6 | 2008 Nissan Qashqai | |
Make | Holden | Nissan |
Model | XU 6 | Qashqai |
Year Released | 1996 | 2008 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 139 HP |
Torque | 515 Nm | 196 Nm |
Drive Type | Front | 4WD |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |