1996 Holden XU 6 vs. 2010 Mitsubishi Outlander
To start off, 2010 Mitsubishi Outlander is newer by 14 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1996 Holden XU 6. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1996 Holden XU 6 would be higher.
Because 2010 Mitsubishi Outlander is all wheel drive (AWD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1996 Holden XU 6. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2010 Mitsubishi Outlander will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1996 Holden XU 6 (515 Nm) has 224 more torque (in Nm) than 2010 Mitsubishi Outlander. (291 Nm). This means 1996 Holden XU 6 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2010 Mitsubishi Outlander.
Compare all specifications:
| 1996 Holden XU 6 | 2010 Mitsubishi Outlander | |
| Make | Holden | Mitsubishi |
| Model | XU 6 | Outlander |
| Year Released | 1996 | 2010 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | V |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 230 HP |
| Torque | 515 Nm | 291 Nm |
| Drive Type | Front | AWD |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
