1996 Holden XU 6 vs. 2010 Rolls-Royce Phantom Drophead Coupe
To start off, 2010 Rolls-Royce Phantom Drophead Coupe is newer by 14 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1996 Holden XU 6. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1996 Holden XU 6 would be higher.
Because 2010 Rolls-Royce Phantom Drophead Coupe is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2010 Rolls-Royce Phantom Drophead Coupe. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1996 Holden XU 6, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2010 Rolls-Royce Phantom Drophead Coupe (719 Nm) has 204 more torque (in Nm) than 1996 Holden XU 6. (515 Nm). This means 2010 Rolls-Royce Phantom Drophead Coupe will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1996 Holden XU 6.
Compare all specifications:
| 1996 Holden XU 6 | 2010 Rolls-Royce Phantom Drophead Coupe | |
| Make | Holden | Rolls-Royce |
| Model | XU 6 | Phantom Drophead Coupe |
| Year Released | 1996 | 2010 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 12 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | V |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 453 HP |
| Torque | 515 Nm | 719 Nm |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
