1996 Holden XU 6 vs. 2010 Volvo C70
To start off, 2010 Volvo C70 is newer by 14 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1996 Holden XU 6. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1996 Holden XU 6 would be higher.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1996 Holden XU 6 (515 Nm) has 115 more torque (in Nm) than 2010 Volvo C70. (400 Nm). This means 1996 Holden XU 6 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2010 Volvo C70.
Compare all specifications:
1996 Holden XU 6 | 2010 Volvo C70 | |
Make | Holden | Volvo |
Model | XU 6 | C70 |
Year Released | 1996 | 2010 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 5 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 0 HP |
Torque | 515 Nm | 400 Nm |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Automatic | 5-speed shiftable automatic |