1996 Holden XU 6 vs. 2012 Chevrolet Colorado
To start off, 2012 Chevrolet Colorado is newer by 16 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1996 Holden XU 6. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1996 Holden XU 6 would be higher.
Because 2012 Chevrolet Colorado is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1996 Holden XU 6. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2012 Chevrolet Colorado will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1996 Holden XU 6 (515 Nm) has 257 more torque (in Nm) than 2012 Chevrolet Colorado. (258 Nm). This means 1996 Holden XU 6 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2012 Chevrolet Colorado. 1996 Holden XU 6 has automatic transmission and 2012 Chevrolet Colorado has manual transmission. 2012 Chevrolet Colorado will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 1996 Holden XU 6 will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 1996 Holden XU 6 | 2012 Chevrolet Colorado | |
| Make | Holden | Chevrolet |
| Model | XU 6 | Colorado |
| Year Released | 1996 | 2012 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 186 HP |
| Torque | 515 Nm | 258 Nm |
| Drive Type | Front | 4WD |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | Manual |
