1996 Holden XU 6 vs. 2012 Honda Accord
To start off, 2012 Honda Accord is newer by 16 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1996 Holden XU 6. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1996 Holden XU 6 would be higher.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1996 Holden XU 6 (515 Nm) has 165 more torque (in Nm) than 2012 Honda Accord. (350 Nm). This means 1996 Holden XU 6 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2012 Honda Accord.
Compare all specifications:
| 1996 Holden XU 6 | 2012 Honda Accord | |
| Make | Holden | Honda |
| Model | XU 6 | Accord |
| Year Released | 1996 | 2012 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 148 HP |
| Torque | 515 Nm | 350 Nm |
| Drive Type | Front | Front |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
