1996 Holden XU 6 vs. 2012 Mercedes-Benz C
To start off, 2012 Mercedes-Benz C is newer by 16 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1996 Holden XU 6. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1996 Holden XU 6 would be higher.
Because 2012 Mercedes-Benz C is all wheel drive (AWD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1996 Holden XU 6. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2012 Mercedes-Benz C will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1996 Holden XU 6 (515 Nm) has 216 more torque (in Nm) than 2012 Mercedes-Benz C. (299 Nm). This means 1996 Holden XU 6 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2012 Mercedes-Benz C.
Compare all specifications:
1996 Holden XU 6 | 2012 Mercedes-Benz C | |
Make | Holden | Mercedes-Benz |
Model | XU 6 | C |
Year Released | 1996 | 2012 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 228 HP |
Torque | 515 Nm | 299 Nm |
Drive Type | Front | AWD |
Transmission Type | Automatic | 7-speed shiftable automatic |