1996 Holden XU 6 vs. 2013 Dodge CHARGER
To start off, 2013 Dodge CHARGER is newer by 17 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1996 Holden XU 6. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1996 Holden XU 6 would be higher.
Because 2013 Dodge CHARGER is all wheel drive (AWD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1996 Holden XU 6. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2013 Dodge CHARGER will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2013 Dodge CHARGER (536 Nm) has 21 more torque (in Nm) than 1996 Holden XU 6. (515 Nm). This means 2013 Dodge CHARGER will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1996 Holden XU 6.
Compare all specifications:
| 1996 Holden XU 6 | 2013 Dodge CHARGER | |
| Make | Holden | Dodge |
| Model | XU 6 | CHARGER |
| Year Released | 1996 | 2013 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | V |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 365 HP |
| Torque | 515 Nm | 536 Nm |
| Drive Type | Front | AWD |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | 5-speed automatic |
