1996 Holden XU 6 vs. 2013 GMC Sierra
To start off, 2013 GMC Sierra is newer by 17 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1996 Holden XU 6. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1996 Holden XU 6 would be higher.
Because 2013 GMC Sierra is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2013 GMC Sierra. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1996 Holden XU 6, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1996 Holden XU 6 (515 Nm) has 101 more torque (in Nm) than 2013 GMC Sierra. (414 Nm). This means 1996 Holden XU 6 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2013 GMC Sierra.
Compare all specifications:
| 1996 Holden XU 6 | 2013 GMC Sierra | |
| Make | Holden | GMC |
| Model | XU 6 | Sierra |
| Year Released | 1996 | 2013 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | V |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 298 HP |
| Torque | 515 Nm | 414 Nm |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | 4-speed automatic |
