1996 Honda Accord vs. 2012 Mitsubishi i-MiEV
To start off, 2012 Mitsubishi i-MiEV is newer by 16 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1996 Honda Accord. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1996 Honda Accord would be higher. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1996 Honda Accord weights approximately 195 kg more than 2012 Mitsubishi i-MiEV.
Because 2012 Mitsubishi i-MiEV is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2012 Mitsubishi i-MiEV. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1996 Honda Accord, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1996 Honda Accord | 2012 Mitsubishi i-MiEV | |
Make | Honda | Mitsubishi |
Model | Accord | i-MiEV |
Year Released | 1996 | 2012 |
Body Type | Coupe | Hatchback |
Engine Position | Front | Rear |
Horse Power | 134 HP | 0 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Electric |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Single Speed |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1365 kg | 1170 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4680 mm | 3678 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1790 mm | 1585 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1400 mm | 1615 mm |