1996 Honda CR-V vs. 2004 Mitsubishi Magna
To start off, 2004 Mitsubishi Magna is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1996 Honda CR-V. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1996 Honda CR-V would be higher. At 2,972 cc (6 cylinders), 2004 Mitsubishi Magna is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Mitsubishi Magna (188 HP) has 60 more horse power than 1996 Honda CR-V. (128 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2004 Mitsubishi Magna should accelerate faster than 1996 Honda CR-V. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1996 Honda CR-V weights approximately 45 kg more than 2004 Mitsubishi Magna.
Because 1996 Honda CR-V is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2004 Mitsubishi Magna. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1996 Honda CR-V will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2004 Mitsubishi Magna (255 Nm) has 75 more torque (in Nm) than 1996 Honda CR-V. (180 Nm). This means 2004 Mitsubishi Magna will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1996 Honda CR-V.
Compare all specifications:
1996 Honda CR-V | 2004 Mitsubishi Magna | |
Make | Honda | Mitsubishi |
Model | CR-V | Magna |
Year Released | 1996 | 2004 |
Body Type | SUV | Station Wagon |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1999 cc | 2972 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 128 HP | 188 HP |
Torque | 180 Nm | 255 Nm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
Vehicle Weight | 1500 kg | 1455 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4560 mm | 4820 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1780 mm | 1790 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1700 mm | 1490 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2620 mm | 2730 mm |