1996 Honda CRX vs. 2010 Ford Ecosport
To start off, 2010 Ford Ecosport is newer by 14 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1996 Honda CRX. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1996 Honda CRX would be higher. At 1,600 cc (4 cylinders), 2010 Ford Ecosport is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1996 Honda CRX (131 HP) has 22 more horse power than 2010 Ford Ecosport. (109 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1996 Honda CRX should accelerate faster than 2010 Ford Ecosport.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1996 Honda CRX | 2010 Ford Ecosport | |
Make | Honda | Ford |
Model | CRX | Ecosport |
Year Released | 1996 | 2010 |
Body Type | Hatchback | SUV |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1590 cc | 1600 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 131 HP | 109 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 3 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4010 mm | 4228 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1700 mm | 1980 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1260 mm | 1679 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2380 mm | 2490 mm |