1996 Honda Integra vs. 2013 Smart Fortwo
To start off, 2013 Smart Fortwo is newer by 17 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1996 Honda Integra. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1996 Honda Integra would be higher. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1996 Honda Integra weights approximately 359 kg more than 2013 Smart Fortwo.
Because 2013 Smart Fortwo is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2013 Smart Fortwo. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1996 Honda Integra, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2013 Smart Fortwo has automatic transmission and 1996 Honda Integra has manual transmission. 1996 Honda Integra will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2013 Smart Fortwo will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 1996 Honda Integra | 2013 Smart Fortwo | |
| Make | Honda | Smart |
| Model | Integra | Fortwo |
| Year Released | 1996 | 2013 |
| Body Type | Hatchback | Convertible |
| Engine Position | Front | Rear |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 3 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 176 HP | 0 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | 5-speed automatic |
| Number of Doors | 3 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1199 kg | 840 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4380 mm | 2695 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1710 mm | 1559 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1290 mm | 1542 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2570 mm | 1867 mm |
