1996 Honda S-MX vs. 2012 Ford Ecosport
To start off, 2012 Ford Ecosport is newer by 16 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1996 Honda S-MX. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1996 Honda S-MX would be higher. At 1,973 cc (4 cylinders), 1996 Honda S-MX is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1996 Honda S-MX (129 HP) has 11 more horse power than 2012 Ford Ecosport. (118 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1996 Honda S-MX should accelerate faster than 2012 Ford Ecosport.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1996 Honda S-MX (191 Nm @ 4200 RPM) has 21 more torque (in Nm) than 2012 Ford Ecosport. (170 Nm @ 1300 RPM). This means 1996 Honda S-MX will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2012 Ford Ecosport.
Compare all specifications:
1996 Honda S-MX | 2012 Ford Ecosport | |
Make | Honda | Ford |
Model | S-MX | Ecosport |
Year Released | 1996 | 2012 |
Body Type | Hatchback | SUV |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1973 cc | 1000 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 3 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 129 HP | 118 HP |
Torque | 191 Nm | 170 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4200 RPM | 1300 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |