1996 Hyundai Elantra vs. 1969 Riley Kestrel
To start off, 1996 Hyundai Elantra is newer by 27 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1969 Riley Kestrel. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1969 Riley Kestrel would be higher. At 1,795 cc (4 cylinders), 1996 Hyundai Elantra is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1996 Hyundai Elantra (130 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 66 more horse power than 1969 Riley Kestrel. (64 HP @ 5750 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1996 Hyundai Elantra should accelerate faster than 1969 Riley Kestrel. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1996 Hyundai Elantra weights approximately 323 kg more than 1969 Riley Kestrel. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1996 Hyundai Elantra (166 Nm @ 5000 RPM) has 70 more torque (in Nm) than 1969 Riley Kestrel. (96 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 1996 Hyundai Elantra will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1969 Riley Kestrel.
Compare all specifications:
1996 Hyundai Elantra | 1969 Riley Kestrel | |
Make | Hyundai | Riley |
Model | Elantra | Kestrel |
Year Released | 1996 | 1969 |
Engine Size | 1795 cc | 1275 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 130 HP | 64 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 5750 RPM |
Torque | 166 Nm | 96 Nm |
Torque RPM | 5000 RPM | 3000 RPM |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Vehicle Weight | 1233 kg | 910 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4460 mm | 3730 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1710 mm | 1540 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1500 mm | 1350 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2560 mm | 2380 mm |