1996 Hyundai Elantra vs. 2010 Tata Nano
To start off, 2010 Tata Nano is newer by 14 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1996 Hyundai Elantra. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1996 Hyundai Elantra would be higher. At 1,795 cc (4 cylinders), 1996 Hyundai Elantra is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1996 Hyundai Elantra (130 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 95 more horse power than 2010 Tata Nano. (35 HP @ 5250 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1996 Hyundai Elantra should accelerate faster than 2010 Tata Nano. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1996 Hyundai Elantra weights approximately 633 kg more than 2010 Tata Nano. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2010 Tata Nano is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2010 Tata Nano. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1996 Hyundai Elantra, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1996 Hyundai Elantra (166 Nm @ 5000 RPM) has 118 more torque (in Nm) than 2010 Tata Nano. (48 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 1996 Hyundai Elantra will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2010 Tata Nano. 1996 Hyundai Elantra has automatic transmission and 2010 Tata Nano has manual transmission. 2010 Tata Nano will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 1996 Hyundai Elantra will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
1996 Hyundai Elantra | 2010 Tata Nano | |
Make | Hyundai | Tata |
Model | Elantra | Nano |
Year Released | 1996 | 2010 |
Body Type | Sedan | Hatchback |
Engine Position | Front | Rear |
Engine Size | 1795 cc | 624 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 2 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 130 HP | 35 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 5250 RPM |
Torque | 166 Nm | 48 Nm |
Torque RPM | 5000 RPM | 3000 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 82 mm | 73.5 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 85 mm | 73.5 mm |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1233 kg | 600 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4460 mm | 3099 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1710 mm | 1495 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1500 mm | 1652 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2560 mm | 2230 mm |