1996 Hyundai Lantra vs. 1994 Mitsubishi FTO
To start off, 1996 Hyundai Lantra is newer by 2 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1994 Mitsubishi FTO. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1994 Mitsubishi FTO would be higher. At 1,996 cc (6 cylinders), 1994 Mitsubishi FTO is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1994 Mitsubishi FTO (197 HP @ 7500 RPM) has 110 more horse power than 1996 Hyundai Lantra. (87 HP @ 5500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1994 Mitsubishi FTO should accelerate faster than 1996 Hyundai Lantra.
Compare all specifications:
1996 Hyundai Lantra | 1994 Mitsubishi FTO | |
Make | Hyundai | Mitsubishi |
Model | Lantra | FTO |
Year Released | 1996 | 1994 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1494 cc | 1996 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 87 HP | 197 HP |
Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 7500 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Length | 4460 mm | 4370 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1710 mm | 1740 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1460 mm | 1310 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2560 mm | 2510 mm |