1996 Isuzu Amigo vs. 1952 Jaguar XK
To start off, 1996 Isuzu Amigo is newer by 44 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1952 Jaguar XK. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1952 Jaguar XK would be higher. At 3,441 cc (6 cylinders), 1952 Jaguar XK is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1952 Jaguar XK (158 HP) has 27 more horse power than 1996 Isuzu Amigo. (131 HP) In normal driving conditions, 1952 Jaguar XK should accelerate faster than 1996 Isuzu Amigo.
Because 1996 Isuzu Amigo is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1952 Jaguar XK. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1996 Isuzu Amigo will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1952 Jaguar XK (290 Nm) has 95 more torque (in Nm) than 1996 Isuzu Amigo. (195 Nm). This means 1952 Jaguar XK will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1996 Isuzu Amigo.
Compare all specifications:
| 1996 Isuzu Amigo | 1952 Jaguar XK | |
| Make | Isuzu | Jaguar |
| Model | Amigo | XK |
| Year Released | 1996 | 1952 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2198 cc | 3441 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 131 HP | 158 HP |
| Torque | 195 Nm | 290 Nm |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 2 seats |
| Vehicle Length | 4280 mm | 4430 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1790 mm | 1570 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1780 mm | 1340 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2340 mm | 2600 mm |
