1996 Isuzu Amigo vs. 1962 Volvo 120
To start off, 1996 Isuzu Amigo is newer by 34 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 Volvo 120. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 Volvo 120 would be higher. At 2,198 cc (4 cylinders), 1996 Isuzu Amigo is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1996 Isuzu Amigo (131 HP) has 64 more horse power than 1962 Volvo 120. (67 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1996 Isuzu Amigo should accelerate faster than 1962 Volvo 120.
Because 1996 Isuzu Amigo is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1962 Volvo 120. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1996 Isuzu Amigo will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1996 Isuzu Amigo (195 Nm) has 51 more torque (in Nm) than 1962 Volvo 120. (144 Nm). This means 1996 Isuzu Amigo will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1962 Volvo 120.
Compare all specifications:
| 1996 Isuzu Amigo | 1962 Volvo 120 | |
| Make | Isuzu | Volvo |
| Model | Amigo | 120 |
| Year Released | 1996 | 1962 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2198 cc | 1778 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 131 HP | 67 HP |
| Torque | 195 Nm | 144 Nm |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Length | 4280 mm | 4460 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1790 mm | 1620 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1780 mm | 1510 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2340 mm | 2610 mm |
