1996 Isuzu Amigo vs. 1982 Nissan Pulsar
To start off, 1996 Isuzu Amigo is newer by 14 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Nissan Pulsar. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Nissan Pulsar would be higher. At 2,198 cc (4 cylinders), 1996 Isuzu Amigo is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1996 Isuzu Amigo (131 HP) has 61 more horse power than 1982 Nissan Pulsar. (70 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1996 Isuzu Amigo should accelerate faster than 1982 Nissan Pulsar.
Because 1996 Isuzu Amigo is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1982 Nissan Pulsar. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1996 Isuzu Amigo will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1996 Isuzu Amigo (195 Nm) has 80 more torque (in Nm) than 1982 Nissan Pulsar. (115 Nm). This means 1996 Isuzu Amigo will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1982 Nissan Pulsar.
Compare all specifications:
| 1996 Isuzu Amigo | 1982 Nissan Pulsar | |
| Make | Isuzu | Nissan |
| Model | Amigo | Pulsar |
| Year Released | 1996 | 1982 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2198 cc | 1488 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 131 HP | 70 HP |
| Torque | 195 Nm | 115 Nm |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Vehicle Length | 4280 mm | 3970 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1790 mm | 1630 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1780 mm | 1400 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2340 mm | 2420 mm |
