1996 Isuzu Amigo vs. 1982 Plymouth Caravelle
To start off, 1996 Isuzu Amigo is newer by 14 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Plymouth Caravelle. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Plymouth Caravelle would be higher. At 2,555 cc (4 cylinders), 1982 Plymouth Caravelle is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1996 Isuzu Amigo (131 HP) has 38 more horse power than 1982 Plymouth Caravelle. (93 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1996 Isuzu Amigo should accelerate faster than 1982 Plymouth Caravelle.
Because 1996 Isuzu Amigo is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1982 Plymouth Caravelle. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1996 Isuzu Amigo will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1996 Isuzu Amigo (195 Nm) has 16 more torque (in Nm) than 1982 Plymouth Caravelle. (179 Nm). This means 1996 Isuzu Amigo will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1982 Plymouth Caravelle.
Compare all specifications:
| 1996 Isuzu Amigo | 1982 Plymouth Caravelle | |
| Make | Isuzu | Plymouth |
| Model | Amigo | Caravelle |
| Year Released | 1996 | 1982 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2198 cc | 2555 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 131 HP | 93 HP |
| Torque | 195 Nm | 179 Nm |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
| Vehicle Length | 4280 mm | 4760 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1790 mm | 1740 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1780 mm | 1350 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2340 mm | 2630 mm |
