1996 Isuzu Amigo vs. 1986 Rover 825
To start off, 1996 Isuzu Amigo is newer by 10 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1986 Rover 825. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1986 Rover 825 would be higher. At 2,499 cc (4 cylinders), 1986 Rover 825 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1996 Isuzu Amigo (131 HP) has 13 more horse power than 1986 Rover 825. (118 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1996 Isuzu Amigo should accelerate faster than 1986 Rover 825.
Because 1996 Isuzu Amigo is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1986 Rover 825. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1996 Isuzu Amigo will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1986 Rover 825 (268 Nm) has 73 more torque (in Nm) than 1996 Isuzu Amigo. (195 Nm). This means 1986 Rover 825 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1996 Isuzu Amigo.
Compare all specifications:
| 1996 Isuzu Amigo | 1986 Rover 825 | |
| Make | Isuzu | Rover |
| Model | Amigo | 825 |
| Year Released | 1996 | 1986 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2198 cc | 2499 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 131 HP | 118 HP |
| Torque | 195 Nm | 268 Nm |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Length | 4280 mm | 4890 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1790 mm | 1740 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1780 mm | 1370 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2340 mm | 2770 mm |
