1996 Isuzu Amigo vs. 1994 Renault Clio
To start off, 1996 Isuzu Amigo is newer by 2 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1994 Renault Clio. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1994 Renault Clio would be higher. At 2,198 cc (4 cylinders), 1996 Isuzu Amigo is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1996 Isuzu Amigo (131 HP) has 72 more horse power than 1994 Renault Clio. (59 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1996 Isuzu Amigo should accelerate faster than 1994 Renault Clio.
Because 1996 Isuzu Amigo is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1994 Renault Clio. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1996 Isuzu Amigo will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1996 Isuzu Amigo (195 Nm) has 110 more torque (in Nm) than 1994 Renault Clio. (85 Nm). This means 1996 Isuzu Amigo will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1994 Renault Clio.
Compare all specifications:
| 1996 Isuzu Amigo | 1994 Renault Clio | |
| Make | Isuzu | Renault |
| Model | Amigo | Clio |
| Year Released | 1996 | 1994 |
| Body Type | SUV | Hatchback |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2198 cc | 1171 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 131 HP | 59 HP |
| Torque | 195 Nm | 85 Nm |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Length | 4280 mm | 3710 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1790 mm | 1630 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1780 mm | 1400 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2340 mm | 2550 mm |
