1996 Isuzu Amigo vs. 2000 Mazda 121
To start off, 2000 Mazda 121 is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1996 Isuzu Amigo. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1996 Isuzu Amigo would be higher. At 2,198 cc (4 cylinders), 1996 Isuzu Amigo is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1996 Isuzu Amigo (131 HP) has 72 more horse power than 2000 Mazda 121. (59 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1996 Isuzu Amigo should accelerate faster than 2000 Mazda 121.
Because 1996 Isuzu Amigo is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2000 Mazda 121. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1996 Isuzu Amigo will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1996 Isuzu Amigo (195 Nm) has 90 more torque (in Nm) than 2000 Mazda 121. (105 Nm). This means 1996 Isuzu Amigo will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2000 Mazda 121.
Compare all specifications:
| 1996 Isuzu Amigo | 2000 Mazda 121 | |
| Make | Isuzu | Mazda |
| Model | Amigo | 121 |
| Year Released | 1996 | 2000 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2198 cc | 1298 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 131 HP | 59 HP |
| Torque | 195 Nm | 105 Nm |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Vehicle Length | 4280 mm | 3830 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1790 mm | 1640 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1780 mm | 1340 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2340 mm | 2460 mm |
