1996 Isuzu Amigo vs. 2000 Mitsubishi SSU
To start off, 2000 Mitsubishi SSU is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1996 Isuzu Amigo. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1996 Isuzu Amigo would be higher. At 2,500 cc (6 cylinders), 2000 Mitsubishi SSU is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1996 Isuzu Amigo (131 HP) has 12 more horse power than 2000 Mitsubishi SSU. (119 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1996 Isuzu Amigo should accelerate faster than 2000 Mitsubishi SSU.
Both vehicles are four wheel drive (4WD) - it offers better handling, traction, and control in all driving conditions compared with front wheel drive or rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2000 Mitsubishi SSU (240 Nm) has 45 more torque (in Nm) than 1996 Isuzu Amigo. (195 Nm). This means 2000 Mitsubishi SSU will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1996 Isuzu Amigo. 2000 Mitsubishi SSU has automatic transmission and 1996 Isuzu Amigo has manual transmission. 1996 Isuzu Amigo will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2000 Mitsubishi SSU will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 1996 Isuzu Amigo | 2000 Mitsubishi SSU | |
| Make | Isuzu | Mitsubishi |
| Model | Amigo | SSU |
| Year Released | 1996 | 2000 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2198 cc | 2500 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 131 HP | 119 HP |
| Torque | 195 Nm | 240 Nm |
| Drive Type | 4WD | 4WD |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
| Wheelbase Size | 2340 mm | 2570 mm |
