1996 Isuzu Amigo vs. 2005 Volkswagen Polo
To start off, 2005 Volkswagen Polo is newer by 9 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1996 Isuzu Amigo. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1996 Isuzu Amigo would be higher. At 2,198 cc (4 cylinders), 1996 Isuzu Amigo is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1996 Isuzu Amigo (131 HP) has 31 more horse power than 2005 Volkswagen Polo. (100 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1996 Isuzu Amigo should accelerate faster than 2005 Volkswagen Polo.
Because 1996 Isuzu Amigo is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2005 Volkswagen Polo. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1996 Isuzu Amigo will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1996 Isuzu Amigo (195 Nm) has 55 more torque (in Nm) than 2005 Volkswagen Polo. (140 Nm). This means 1996 Isuzu Amigo will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2005 Volkswagen Polo.
Compare all specifications:
| 1996 Isuzu Amigo | 2005 Volkswagen Polo | |
| Make | Isuzu | Volkswagen |
| Model | Amigo | Polo |
| Year Released | 1996 | 2005 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2198 cc | 1595 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 131 HP | 100 HP |
| Torque | 195 Nm | 140 Nm |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
| Wheelbase Size | 2340 mm | 2520 mm |
