1996 Isuzu Amigo vs. 2009 Audi A3
To start off, 2009 Audi A3 is newer by 13 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1996 Isuzu Amigo. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1996 Isuzu Amigo would be higher. At 2,198 cc (4 cylinders), 1996 Isuzu Amigo is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Audi A3 (148 HP) has 17 more horse power than 1996 Isuzu Amigo. (131 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2009 Audi A3 should accelerate faster than 1996 Isuzu Amigo.
Because 1996 Isuzu Amigo is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2009 Audi A3. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1996 Isuzu Amigo will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 Audi A3 (200 Nm) has 5 more torque (in Nm) than 1996 Isuzu Amigo. (195 Nm). This means 2009 Audi A3 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1996 Isuzu Amigo. 2009 Audi A3 has automatic transmission and 1996 Isuzu Amigo has manual transmission. 1996 Isuzu Amigo will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2009 Audi A3 will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
1996 Isuzu Amigo | 2009 Audi A3 | |
Make | Isuzu | Audi |
Model | Amigo | A3 |
Year Released | 1996 | 2009 |
Body Type | SUV | Hatchback |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2198 cc | 1984 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 131 HP | 148 HP |
Torque | 195 Nm | 200 Nm |
Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Length | 4280 mm | 4220 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1790 mm | 1770 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1780 mm | 1430 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2340 mm | 2580 mm |