1996 Isuzu Amigo vs. 2009 Mazda 3
To start off, 2009 Mazda 3 is newer by 13 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1996 Isuzu Amigo. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1996 Isuzu Amigo would be higher. At 2,198 cc (4 cylinders), 1996 Isuzu Amigo is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1996 Isuzu Amigo (131 HP) has 27 more horse power than 2009 Mazda 3. (104 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1996 Isuzu Amigo should accelerate faster than 2009 Mazda 3.
Because 1996 Isuzu Amigo is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2009 Mazda 3. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1996 Isuzu Amigo will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1996 Isuzu Amigo (195 Nm) has 50 more torque (in Nm) than 2009 Mazda 3. (145 Nm). This means 1996 Isuzu Amigo will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2009 Mazda 3.
Compare all specifications:
| 1996 Isuzu Amigo | 2009 Mazda 3 | |
| Make | Isuzu | Mazda |
| Model | Amigo | 3 |
| Year Released | 1996 | 2009 |
| Body Type | SUV | Hatchback |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2198 cc | 1596 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 131 HP | 104 HP |
| Torque | 195 Nm | 145 Nm |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Length | 4280 mm | 4430 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1790 mm | 1760 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1780 mm | 1470 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2340 mm | 2650 mm |
