1996 Isuzu Amigo vs. 2009 Mazda BT-50
To start off, 2009 Mazda BT-50 is newer by 13 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1996 Isuzu Amigo. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1996 Isuzu Amigo would be higher. At 2,606 cc (4 cylinders), 2009 Mazda BT-50 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1996 Isuzu Amigo (131 HP) has 8 more horse power than 2009 Mazda BT-50. (123 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1996 Isuzu Amigo should accelerate faster than 2009 Mazda BT-50.
Both vehicles are four wheel drive (4WD) - it offers better handling, traction, and control in all driving conditions compared with front wheel drive or rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 Mazda BT-50 (206 Nm) has 11 more torque (in Nm) than 1996 Isuzu Amigo. (195 Nm). This means 2009 Mazda BT-50 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1996 Isuzu Amigo.
Compare all specifications:
1996 Isuzu Amigo | 2009 Mazda BT-50 | |
Make | Isuzu | Mazda |
Model | Amigo | BT-50 |
Year Released | 1996 | 2009 |
Body Type | SUV | Pickup |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2198 cc | 2606 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 131 HP | 123 HP |
Torque | 195 Nm | 206 Nm |
Drive Type | 4WD | 4WD |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 2 seats |
Vehicle Height | 1780 mm | 1810 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2340 mm | 3010 mm |