1996 Isuzu Amigo vs. 2013 Land Rover Range Rover Sport
To start off, 2013 Land Rover Range Rover Sport is newer by 17 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1996 Isuzu Amigo. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1996 Isuzu Amigo would be higher. At 2,198 cc (4 cylinders), 1996 Isuzu Amigo is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2013 Land Rover Range Rover Sport (503 HP) has 372 more horse power than 1996 Isuzu Amigo. (131 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2013 Land Rover Range Rover Sport should accelerate faster than 1996 Isuzu Amigo.
With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2013 Land Rover Range Rover Sport (625 Nm) has 430 more torque (in Nm) than 1996 Isuzu Amigo. (195 Nm). This means 2013 Land Rover Range Rover Sport will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1996 Isuzu Amigo.
Compare all specifications:
| 1996 Isuzu Amigo | 2013 Land Rover Range Rover Sport | |
| Make | Isuzu | Land Rover |
| Model | Amigo | Range Rover Sport |
| Year Released | 1996 | 2013 |
| Body Type | SUV | SUV |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2198 cc | 2013 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | electric |
| Horse Power | 131 HP | 503 HP |
| Torque | 195 Nm | 625 Nm |
| Drive Type | 4WD | AWD |
| Transmission Type | Manual | 6-speed manual |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Length | 4280 mm | 4783 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1790 mm | 2158 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1780 mm | 1784 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2340 mm | 2745 mm |
