1996 Isuzu Amigo vs. 2013 Mazda 3
To start off, 2013 Mazda 3 is newer by 17 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1996 Isuzu Amigo. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1996 Isuzu Amigo would be higher. At 2,198 cc (4 cylinders), 1996 Isuzu Amigo is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2013 Mazda 3 (153 HP) has 22 more horse power than 1996 Isuzu Amigo. (131 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2013 Mazda 3 should accelerate faster than 1996 Isuzu Amigo.
Because 1996 Isuzu Amigo is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2013 Mazda 3. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1996 Isuzu Amigo will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2013 Mazda 3 (200 Nm) has 5 more torque (in Nm) than 1996 Isuzu Amigo. (195 Nm). This means 2013 Mazda 3 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1996 Isuzu Amigo.
Compare all specifications:
| 1996 Isuzu Amigo | 2013 Mazda 3 | |
| Make | Isuzu | Mazda |
| Model | Amigo | 3 |
| Year Released | 1996 | 2013 |
| Body Type | SUV | Sedan |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2198 cc | 1998 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 131 HP | 153 HP |
| Torque | 195 Nm | 200 Nm |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | 6-speed manual |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Length | 4280 mm | 4595 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1790 mm | 1755 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1780 mm | 1470 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2340 mm | 2640 mm |
