1996 Italdesign Formula 4 vs. 1952 Jaguar XK
To start off, 1996 Italdesign Formula 4 is newer by 44 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1952 Jaguar XK. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1952 Jaguar XK would be higher. At 3,441 cc (6 cylinders), 1952 Jaguar XK is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1952 Jaguar XK (158 HP) has 11 more horse power than 1996 Italdesign Formula 4. (147 HP) In normal driving conditions, 1952 Jaguar XK should accelerate faster than 1996 Italdesign Formula 4.
Because 1952 Jaguar XK is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1952 Jaguar XK. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1996 Italdesign Formula 4, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1952 Jaguar XK (290 Nm) has 103 more torque (in Nm) than 1996 Italdesign Formula 4. (187 Nm). This means 1952 Jaguar XK will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1996 Italdesign Formula 4.
Compare all specifications:
| 1996 Italdesign Formula 4 | 1952 Jaguar XK | |
| Make | Italdesign | Jaguar |
| Model | Formula 4 | XK |
| Year Released | 1996 | 1952 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1998 cc | 3441 cc |
| Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 147 HP | 158 HP |
| Torque | 187 Nm | 290 Nm |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 2 seats |
| Vehicle Length | 4160 mm | 4430 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1830 mm | 1570 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1200 mm | 1340 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2550 mm | 2600 mm |
