1996 Italdesign Formula 4 vs. 2009 Mazda 6
To start off, 2009 Mazda 6 is newer by 13 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1996 Italdesign Formula 4. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1996 Italdesign Formula 4 would be higher. At 3,725 cc (6 cylinders), 2009 Mazda 6 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Mazda 6 (272 HP) has 125 more horse power than 1996 Italdesign Formula 4. (147 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2009 Mazda 6 should accelerate faster than 1996 Italdesign Formula 4.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 Mazda 6 (365 Nm) has 178 more torque (in Nm) than 1996 Italdesign Formula 4. (187 Nm). This means 2009 Mazda 6 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1996 Italdesign Formula 4. 2009 Mazda 6 has automatic transmission and 1996 Italdesign Formula 4 has manual transmission. 1996 Italdesign Formula 4 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2009 Mazda 6 will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
1996 Italdesign Formula 4 | 2009 Mazda 6 | |
Make | Italdesign | Mazda |
Model | Formula 4 | 6 |
Year Released | 1996 | 2009 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1998 cc | 3725 cc |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 147 HP | 272 HP |
Torque | 187 Nm | 365 Nm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 10.0:1 | 8.4:1 |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Length | 4160 mm | 4930 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1830 mm | 1850 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1200 mm | 1480 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2550 mm | 2800 mm |