1996 Italdesign Legram vs. 1980 Mazda Cosmo
To start off, 1996 Italdesign Legram is newer by 16 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1980 Mazda Cosmo. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1980 Mazda Cosmo would be higher. At 1,998 cc (5 cylinders), 1996 Italdesign Legram is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1996 Italdesign Legram (147 HP) has 54 more horse power than 1980 Mazda Cosmo. (93 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1996 Italdesign Legram should accelerate faster than 1980 Mazda Cosmo.
Because 1980 Mazda Cosmo is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1980 Mazda Cosmo. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1996 Italdesign Legram, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 1996 Italdesign Legram has automatic transmission and 1980 Mazda Cosmo has manual transmission. 1980 Mazda Cosmo will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 1996 Italdesign Legram will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 1996 Italdesign Legram | 1980 Mazda Cosmo | |
| Make | Italdesign | Mazda |
| Model | Legram | Cosmo |
| Year Released | 1996 | 1980 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1998 cc | 1769 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 5 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 147 HP | 93 HP |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 4 seats |
| Vehicle Length | 4270 mm | 4480 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1780 mm | 1690 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1300 mm | 1340 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2550 mm | 2520 mm |
