1996 Italdesign Legram vs. 2010 Cadillac STS
To start off, 2010 Cadillac STS is newer by 14 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1996 Italdesign Legram. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1996 Italdesign Legram would be higher. At 3,600 cc (6 cylinders), 2010 Cadillac STS is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Cadillac STS (302 HP) has 155 more horse power than 1996 Italdesign Legram. (147 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Cadillac STS should accelerate faster than 1996 Italdesign Legram.
Because 2010 Cadillac STS is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2010 Cadillac STS. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1996 Italdesign Legram, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1996 Italdesign Legram | 2010 Cadillac STS | |
| Make | Italdesign | Cadillac |
| Model | Legram | STS |
| Year Released | 1996 | 2010 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1998 cc | 3600 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 5 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 147 HP | 302 HP |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Length | 4270 mm | 4996 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1780 mm | 1844 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1300 mm | 1463 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2550 mm | 2957 mm |
