1996 Italdesign Legram vs. 2013 Smart Fortwo
To start off, 2013 Smart Fortwo is newer by 17 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1996 Italdesign Legram. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1996 Italdesign Legram would be higher.
Because 2013 Smart Fortwo is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2013 Smart Fortwo. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1996 Italdesign Legram, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1996 Italdesign Legram | 2013 Smart Fortwo | |
Make | Italdesign | Smart |
Model | Legram | Fortwo |
Year Released | 1996 | 2013 |
Engine Position | Front | Rear |
Engine Type | in-line | electric |
Horse Power | 147 HP | 0 HP |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Automatic | 5-speed automatic |
Vehicle Length | 4270 mm | 2695 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1780 mm | 1559 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1300 mm | 1542 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2550 mm | 1867 mm |