1996 Jaguar XJS vs. 1973 Mazda RX-2
To start off, 1996 Jaguar XJS is newer by 23 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1973 Mazda RX-2. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1973 Mazda RX-2 would be higher. At 3,978 cc (6 cylinders), 1996 Jaguar XJS is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1996 Jaguar XJS (222 HP) has 104 more horse power than 1973 Mazda RX-2. (118 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1996 Jaguar XJS should accelerate faster than 1973 Mazda RX-2.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1996 Jaguar XJS | 1973 Mazda RX-2 | |
| Make | Jaguar | Mazda |
| Model | XJS | RX-2 |
| Year Released | 1996 | 1973 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3978 cc | 2292 cc |
| Engine Type | in-line | dual-disk rotary |
| Horse Power | 222 HP | 118 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Length | 4770 mm | 4160 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1800 mm | 1590 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1270 mm | 1400 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2600 mm | 2480 mm |
