1996 Jaguar XJS vs. 2003 Jaguar X-Type
To start off, 2003 Jaguar X-Type is newer by 7 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1996 Jaguar XJS. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1996 Jaguar XJS would be higher. At 3,978 cc (6 cylinders), 1996 Jaguar XJS is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 Jaguar X-Type (390 HP) has 168 more horse power than 1996 Jaguar XJS. (222 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2003 Jaguar X-Type should accelerate faster than 1996 Jaguar XJS.
Because 1996 Jaguar XJS is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1996 Jaguar XJS. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2003 Jaguar X-Type, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1996 Jaguar XJS | 2003 Jaguar X-Type | |
Make | Jaguar | Jaguar |
Model | XJS | X-Type |
Year Released | 1996 | 2003 |
Body Type | Convertible | Sedan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3978 cc | 1996 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 222 HP | 390 HP |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4770 mm | 4680 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1800 mm | 1800 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1270 mm | 1400 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2600 mm | 2720 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 82 L | 61 L |