1996 Jaguar XJS vs. 2005 Ford Ecosport
To start off, 2005 Ford Ecosport is newer by 9 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1996 Jaguar XJS. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1996 Jaguar XJS would be higher. At 3,978 cc (6 cylinders), 1996 Jaguar XJS is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1996 Jaguar XJS (222 HP) has 79 more horse power than 2005 Ford Ecosport. (143 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1996 Jaguar XJS should accelerate faster than 2005 Ford Ecosport.
Because 1996 Jaguar XJS is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1996 Jaguar XJS. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2005 Ford Ecosport, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1996 Jaguar XJS | 2005 Ford Ecosport | |
Make | Jaguar | Ford |
Model | XJS | Ecosport |
Year Released | 1996 | 2005 |
Body Type | Convertible | SUV |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3978 cc | 2000 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 222 HP | 143 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4770 mm | 4228 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1800 mm | 1980 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1270 mm | 1679 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2600 mm | 2490 mm |