1996 Jaguar XJS vs. 2010 Jeep Compass
To start off, 2010 Jeep Compass is newer by 14 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1996 Jaguar XJS. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1996 Jaguar XJS would be higher. At 3,978 cc (6 cylinders), 1996 Jaguar XJS is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1996 Jaguar XJS (222 HP) has 50 more horse power than 2010 Jeep Compass. (172 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1996 Jaguar XJS should accelerate faster than 2010 Jeep Compass.
Because 1996 Jaguar XJS is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1996 Jaguar XJS. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2010 Jeep Compass, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1996 Jaguar XJS | 2010 Jeep Compass | |
Make | Jaguar | Jeep |
Model | XJS | Compass |
Year Released | 1996 | 2010 |
Body Type | Convertible | Crossover |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3978 cc | 2400 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 222 HP | 172 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4770 mm | 4404 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1800 mm | 1760 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1270 mm | 1656 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2600 mm | 2634 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 82 L | 51 L |