1996 Jaguar XJS vs. 2010 Nissan GT-R
To start off, 2010 Nissan GT-R is newer by 14 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1996 Jaguar XJS. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1996 Jaguar XJS would be higher. At 3,978 cc (6 cylinders), 1996 Jaguar XJS is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Nissan GT-R (485 HP) has 263 more horse power than 1996 Jaguar XJS. (222 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Nissan GT-R should accelerate faster than 1996 Jaguar XJS.
Because 2010 Nissan GT-R is all wheel drive (AWD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1996 Jaguar XJS. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2010 Nissan GT-R will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1996 Jaguar XJS | 2010 Nissan GT-R | |
| Make | Jaguar | Nissan |
| Model | XJS | GT-R |
| Year Released | 1996 | 2010 |
| Body Type | Convertible | Coupe |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3978 cc | 3800 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 222 HP | 485 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | AWD |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 4 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Length | 4770 mm | 4651 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1800 mm | 1902 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1270 mm | 1372 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2600 mm | 2779 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 82 L | 74 L |
