1996 Jaguar XJS vs. 2012 Volvo S80
To start off, 2012 Volvo S80 is newer by 16 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1996 Jaguar XJS. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1996 Jaguar XJS would be higher. At 3,978 cc (6 cylinders), 1996 Jaguar XJS is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2012 Volvo S80 (300 HP) has 78 more horse power than 1996 Jaguar XJS. (222 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2012 Volvo S80 should accelerate faster than 1996 Jaguar XJS.
Because 2012 Volvo S80 is all wheel drive (AWD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1996 Jaguar XJS. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2012 Volvo S80 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2012 Volvo S80 has automatic transmission and 1996 Jaguar XJS has manual transmission. 1996 Jaguar XJS will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2012 Volvo S80 will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
1996 Jaguar XJS | 2012 Volvo S80 | |
Make | Jaguar | Volvo |
Model | XJS | S80 |
Year Released | 1996 | 2012 |
Body Type | Convertible | Sedan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3978 cc | 3000 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 222 HP | 300 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | AWD |
Transmission Type | Manual | 6-speed shiftable automatic |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4770 mm | 4851 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1800 mm | 1862 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2600 mm | 2835 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 82 L | 70 L |