1996 Jaguar XK vs. 1985 Plymouth Sundance
To start off, 1996 Jaguar XK is newer by 11 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1985 Plymouth Sundance. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1985 Plymouth Sundance would be higher. At 3,996 cc (8 cylinders), 1996 Jaguar XK is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1996 Jaguar XK (290 HP @ 6100 RPM) has 194 more horse power than 1985 Plymouth Sundance. (96 HP @ 5200 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1996 Jaguar XK should accelerate faster than 1985 Plymouth Sundance. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1996 Jaguar XK weights approximately 395 kg more than 1985 Plymouth Sundance. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1996 Jaguar XK is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1996 Jaguar XK. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1985 Plymouth Sundance, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1996 Jaguar XK | 1985 Plymouth Sundance | |
| Make | Jaguar | Plymouth |
| Model | XK | Sundance |
| Year Released | 1996 | 1985 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3996 cc | 2212 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 290 HP | 96 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6100 RPM | 5200 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Vehicle Weight | 1570 kg | 1175 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4770 mm | 4370 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1840 mm | 1720 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3040 mm | 2470 mm |
