1996 Jaguar XK vs. 1991 Mazda 626

To start off, 1996 Jaguar XK is newer by 5 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1991 Mazda 626. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1991 Mazda 626 would be higher. At 3,996 cc (8 cylinders), 1996 Jaguar XK is equipped with a bigger engine.

Because 1996 Jaguar XK is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1996 Jaguar XK. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1991 Mazda 626, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 1996 Jaguar XK has automatic transmission and 1991 Mazda 626 has manual transmission. 1991 Mazda 626 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 1996 Jaguar XK will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.

Compare all specifications:

1996 Jaguar XK 1991 Mazda 626
Make Jaguar Mazda
Model XK 626
Year Released 1996 1991
Body Type Coupe Coupe
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 3996 cc 1997 cc
Engine Cylinders 8 cylinders 4 cylinders
Engine Type V in-line
Valves per Cylinder 4 valves 3 valves
Horse Power 370 HP 0 HP
Fuel Type Gasoline Gasoline
Drive Type Rear Front
Transmission Type Automatic Manual
Number of Seats 4 seats 4 seats
Number of Doors 2 doors 2 doors
Vehicle Length 4770 mm 4460 mm
Vehicle Width 1840 mm 1700 mm
Vehicle Height 1320 mm 1370 mm
Wheelbase Size 2600 mm 2520 mm