1996 Jaguar XK vs. 1999 Mazda RX-01
To start off, 1999 Mazda RX-01 is newer by 3 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1996 Jaguar XK. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1996 Jaguar XK would be higher. At 3,996 cc (8 cylinders), 1996 Jaguar XK is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1996 Jaguar XK (370 HP @ 6150 RPM) has 153 more horse power than 1999 Mazda RX-01. (217 HP @ 8500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1996 Jaguar XK should accelerate faster than 1999 Mazda RX-01.
Let's talk about torque, 1996 Jaguar XK (535 Nm @ 3600 RPM) has 319 more torque (in Nm) than 1999 Mazda RX-01. (216 Nm @ 6500 RPM). This means 1996 Jaguar XK will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1999 Mazda RX-01.
Compare all specifications:
| 1996 Jaguar XK | 1999 Mazda RX-01 | |
| Make | Jaguar | Mazda |
| Model | XK | RX-01 |
| Year Released | 1996 | 1999 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3996 cc | 2610 cc |
| Engine Type | V | dual-disk rotary |
| Horse Power | 370 HP | 217 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6150 RPM | 8500 RPM |
| Torque | 535 Nm | 216 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 3600 RPM | 6500 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 2 seats |
| Vehicle Length | 4770 mm | 4060 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1840 mm | 1740 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1320 mm | 1250 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2600 mm | 2350 mm |
