1996 Jaguar XK vs. 2000 Lada Tarzan
To start off, 2000 Lada Tarzan is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1996 Jaguar XK. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1996 Jaguar XK would be higher. At 3,996 cc (8 cylinders), 1996 Jaguar XK is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1996 Jaguar XK (290 HP @ 6100 RPM) has 213 more horse power than 2000 Lada Tarzan. (77 HP @ 5400 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1996 Jaguar XK should accelerate faster than 2000 Lada Tarzan. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1996 Jaguar XK weights approximately 655 kg more than 2000 Lada Tarzan. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2000 Lada Tarzan is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1996 Jaguar XK. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 Lada Tarzan will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1996 Jaguar XK (393 Nm) has 276 more torque (in Nm) than 2000 Lada Tarzan. (117 Nm). This means 1996 Jaguar XK will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2000 Lada Tarzan.
Compare all specifications:
1996 Jaguar XK | 2000 Lada Tarzan | |
Make | Jaguar | Lada |
Model | XK | Tarzan |
Year Released | 1996 | 2000 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3996 cc | 1499 cc |
Horse Power | 290 HP | 77 HP |
Engine RPM | 6100 RPM | 5400 RPM |
Torque | 393 Nm | 117 Nm |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
Vehicle Weight | 1700 kg | 1045 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 2600 mm | 2500 mm |