1996 Jaguar XK vs. 2001 Mercedes-Benz CLK

To start off, 2001 Mercedes-Benz CLK is newer by 5 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1996 Jaguar XK. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1996 Jaguar XK would be higher. At 5,000 cc (8 cylinders), 2001 Mercedes-Benz CLK is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1996 Jaguar XK (370 HP @ 6150 RPM) has 276 more horse power than 2001 Mercedes-Benz CLK. (94 HP @ 4200 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1996 Jaguar XK should accelerate faster than 2001 Mercedes-Benz CLK. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2001 Mercedes-Benz CLK weights approximately 370 kg more than 1996 Jaguar XK.

Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1996 Jaguar XK (525 Nm) has 65 more torque (in Nm) than 2001 Mercedes-Benz CLK. (460 Nm). This means 1996 Jaguar XK will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2001 Mercedes-Benz CLK.

Compare all specifications:

1996 Jaguar XK 2001 Mercedes-Benz CLK
Make Jaguar Mercedes-Benz
Model XK CLK
Year Released 1996 2001
Body Type Convertible Coupe
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 3996 cc 5000 cc
Engine Cylinders 8 cylinders 8 cylinders
Engine Type V V
Horse Power 370 HP 94 HP
Engine RPM 6150 RPM 4200 RPM
Torque 525 Nm 460 Nm
Drive Type Rear Rear
Transmission Type Automatic Automatic
Number of Seats 4 seats 4 seats
Number of Doors 2 doors 2 doors
Vehicle Weight 1640 kg 2010 kg
Vehicle Length 4770 mm 4580 mm
Vehicle Width 1840 mm 1730 mm
Vehicle Height 1320 mm 1350 mm
Wheelbase Size 2600 mm 2720 mm
Fuel Tank Capacity 75 L 80 L