1996 Jaguar XK vs. 2001 Mitsubishi SUW
To start off, 2001 Mitsubishi SUW is newer by 5 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1996 Jaguar XK. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1996 Jaguar XK would be higher. At 3,996 cc (8 cylinders), 1996 Jaguar XK is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1996 Jaguar XK (290 HP @ 6100 RPM) has 170 more horse power than 2001 Mitsubishi SUW. (120 HP @ 4000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1996 Jaguar XK should accelerate faster than 2001 Mitsubishi SUW. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2001 Mitsubishi SUW weights approximately 205 kg more than 1996 Jaguar XK.
Because 1996 Jaguar XK is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1996 Jaguar XK. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2001 Mitsubishi SUW, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1996 Jaguar XK (393 Nm) has 153 more torque (in Nm) than 2001 Mitsubishi SUW. (240 Nm). This means 1996 Jaguar XK will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2001 Mitsubishi SUW.
Compare all specifications:
| 1996 Jaguar XK | 2001 Mitsubishi SUW | |
| Make | Jaguar | Mitsubishi |
| Model | XK | SUW |
| Year Released | 1996 | 2001 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3996 cc | 1097 cc |
| Horse Power | 290 HP | 120 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6100 RPM | 4000 RPM |
| Torque | 393 Nm | 240 Nm |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
| Vehicle Weight | 1700 kg | 1905 kg |
| Wheelbase Size | 2600 mm | 2630 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 75 L | 71 L |
